In preparation for this paper, we asked ourselves the question:
Are there any 'missing' scientists in the John Oxley Library?
As it turned out, there are forgotten scientists, both amateur
and professional, represented in the Library's holdings. There
are personal papers and references to these people can be found
in the records of amateur scientific societies such as the Brisbane
Astronomical Society, the Astronomical Society of Queensland and
the Anthropology Society of Queensland.
The story of how these three collections came to be in the Library
provides an interesting insight into changing attitudes within
Australia's scientific community. The records of the two Astronomical
Societies came to us through their joint successor body, the Astronomical
Association of Queensland. This is in stark contrast to the records
of the Anthropology Society of Queensland which was virtually
wound up in 1992 following the death of one of its long time members,
Stan Colliver.
It is interesting to reflect on why the Anthropology Society
has ceased to exist while other amateur scientific societies such
as the astronomical societies continue to flourish. Unlike astronomy,
the study of anthropology has been dramatically influenced by
changing attitudes toward the study of people. In Australia, as
in many other countries the investigation and observation of indigenous
peoples has changed over time as indigenes assert their right
to self determination. Anthropologists have been accused of playing
an integral part in the suppression of indigenous people by using
'science' to give credence to theories of racial superiority based
on skin colour, appearance and technological development. Over
the last twenty years, the disciplines of anthropology and archaeology
in Australia have moved in a direction where today no work is
carried out without consultation with Aboriginal communities.
Moreover, to work as an anthropologist or archaeologist in this
country formal tertiary training is essential - the observations
and work of amateurs are no longer acceptable despite the fact
that so much of the ethnographic primary source material used
by anthropologists and archaeologists today was collected by amateurs.
So who are these amateur scientists we are resurrecting from
Queensland's scientific past? From the records of the Astronomical
and Anthropology Societies we have identified a number of individuals
whose contributions to their Society and scientific discipline
are worthy of mention.
As with so many organisations, the work of maintaining a Society
fell to a few dedicated people like the late Stan Colliver. In
the Brisbane Astronomical Society that dedicated individual was
Dudley Eglinton. Born in 1850, Eglinton was one of the founders
of the Brisbane Astronomical Society which held its first meeting
in 1896. With no formal training in astronomy, Eglinton contributed
along with 76 other people to the purchase of a telescope to be
used by the newly formed Society. Eventually a 6" Grubb Equatorial
Refractor was bought to be used jointly for scientific and general
purposes and to stimulate interest in astronomy. Unfortunately
the telescope was used very little by society members over the
years except for Eglinton and a few others. Eventually it was
the telescope, the Society's prize possession, which led to the
Brisbane Astronomical Society's downfall. After years of feuding
between members over ownership and where the telescope should
be located, one of the trustees 'surreptitiously' removed the
object glass from the telescope and that was the end of the Society.
It was not until 1927 that another astronomical society was formed.
Despite the stormy history of the Brisbane Astronomical Society,
Eglinton's participation and contribution clearly stand out in
the Society's records. To promote astronomy Eglinton worked tirelessly,
giving lectures, writing papers and contributing articles to newspapers.
He also used the telescope to give public demonstrations and raise
money for the Belgian Relief Fund. Such was his dedication, he
even offered to give demonstrations on Christmas Day. Although
he actually denied that he was an astronomer, Eglinton's abilities
were obviously held in high regard and he was appointed a Fellow
of the English Royal Astronomical Society (FRAS) in 1912.
An interesting aspect of Eglinton's life was bought to our attention
by another collection of records we uncovered in our search -
a collection of papers received last year relating to the Eglinton
family. To our delight this collection contained astronomical
notes made by Eglinton and a record of his public lectures. Of
equal interest, however, was a collection of newspaper cuttings
of articles by well known geologist and botanist Sydney Skertchly
who wrote a column called 'The Naturalist'. It soon became apparent
to us that the two men were well acquainted with each other and
that Eglinton had supplied Skertchly with information for his
column. Within the cuttings we also found some original hand-written
scientific poetry by Skertchly and a photograph with the following
dedication - 'Dear Dudley Eglinton, who smileth at my `pars',
while I sit spellbound while you show me stars!'
After the disintegration of the Brisbane Astronomical Society,
Eglinton continued his enthusiastic promotion of astronomy. In
1919 he formed the Queensland Popular Science and Art Society
and again sought to purchase a telescope. When the Astronomical
Society formed in 1927 he was appointed vice-president even though
he was in his late seventies and quite blind, and continued to
write papers which his wife delivered on his behalf. He also managed
to transfer the funds of the old Brisbane Astronomical Society
to the new Society. In 1935 Eglinton was made an honorary life
member of the Society. He died two years later in 1937.
It was interesting to note that as Eglinton's health began to
fail, his wife gave his papers. The minutes of the Society reveal
that Mrs Eglinton was far from ignorant on the subject of astronomy;
indeed she and a number of other female members actively contributed
by presenting papers and debating the latest theories on subjects
such as comet behaviour. In the original Brisbane Astronomical
Society constitution it was stated that 'Ladies shall be on the
same footing as gentlemen'. It appears, judging by the records
of the meetings, where the contributions of both sexes were duly
noted, that this ruling was upheld. In 1929, for example, the
minutes record that society member Mrs. Dafter had discovered
a variable star in Centaurus.
In keeping with the tradition started by Eglinton, Society member
William Newell, Queensland's State Government Astronomical Observer
between 1947 and 1957, ran classes in astronomy and telescope-making
at adult education centres, which attracted many new members to
the Society. A collection of photographs donated with the Society's
records show examples of home made telescopes and Society members
lining up to view the night sky. Today in Queensland there are
a number of amateur astronomical associations, with branches throughout
the state, which continue to promote the study of astronomy in
Australia.
The Anthropology Society of Queensland was founded in 1948 by
Professor H.J. Wilkinson and Dr L.P. Winterbotham, to promote
the study of anthropology. While the Society never maintained
a large membership, its work did generate public interest. The
work of Winterbotham in his capacity as honorary curator of the
Anthropology Museum at the University of Queensland provides a
fascinating insight into how ethnographic collections were assembled.
As a result of Winterbotham's connection with the Anthropology
Society the records of the Anthropology Museum have been preserved
within the official records of the Society. As a doctor of medicine,
Winterbotham had no formal anthropological training, yet he devoted
most of his life to the study of anthropology and was himself
an enthusiastic collector of artefacts. His personal collection
of artefacts formed the initial museum collection when he donated
it to the University in 1948. Winterbotham was also influential
in introducing the study of anthropology into the university curriculum.
Two series of inward and outward correspondence document Winterbotham's
attempts to purchase artefacts for the Museum and to gather information
on Australian Aborigines. An advertising leaflet issued by the
Anthropology Museum, found amongst the correspondence, illustrates
the way in which material was obtained. The collection of artefacts,
particularly secret/sacred objects, was encouraged as these items
were highly prized by museums for display purposes. The feelings
of Aborigines in regard to the collection of this material were
not considered. No doubt Winterbotham and other members of the
Anthropology Society had the best intentions in collecting the
material culture of a people they believed were dying out. As
noted in the leaflet, the Museum sought assistance from the public
to acquire relics while they were still available and before they
disappeared. A number of Winterbotham's contacts procured artefacts
for the Museum on a regular basis and included quite detailed
descriptions of the objects in regards to their provenance and
their use. The importance of this type of documentation has more
recently been brought to our attention through liaison with the
Anthropology Museum. It appears that donor registers were not
always kept, and information about many of the Museum's artefacts
is documented only in Winterbotham's correspondence.
Winterbotham had many informants from all over Australia, some
of whom were members of the Society. One such informant was Alice
Duncan-Kemp, well known author of books such as Where Strange
Paths Go Down and Our Channel Country. Brought up in
far south-west Queensland, Duncan-Kemp (born in 1901) was in close
contact with local Aborigines for much of her life. While claiming
to be more of a naturalist than an anthropologist, Duncan-Kemp
was a keen observer of Aboriginal culture and recorded a wealth
of information about different indigenous groups from the Channel
country in her books. She corresponded regularly with Winterbotham
who appears to have bombarded her with questions relating to Aborigines.
Most of the people Winterbotham corresponded with were not trained
anthropologists or archaeologists, yet like Alice Duncan-Kemp
they provided him with a significant amount of detail based on
their own observations, or on recounting information related to
them by others. Many of his informants supplied detailed linguistic
information; others described archaeological sites, giving their
locations and often the contents of the sites.
Society members contributed to this body of knowledge in a number
of ways. One major project undertaken by members of the Anthropology
Society was the recording of Bora grounds. Many of the Bora rings
around south-east Queensland were mapped and photographed by Society
members. A number of stone arrangements were also documented.
While the manner in which these sites were recorded may be questioned
by archaeologists today, the fact that some documentation exists
revealing the nature of these sites as they were 40 to 50 years
ago is invaluable.
Names of people found in these collections led us ever deeper
into the Library's holdings. An example from Reginald Hurd's cutting
books demonstrates how many of our collections interrelate with
each other. One page in Book No. 6 has the following newspaper
cuttings - Clement Wragge describing 'Astronomical Phenomena',
Archibald Meston writing about the 'Talgai Skull' and Sir Edgeworth
David's commenting on 'Fossils in Queensland'. Hurd's principal
interest was conchology but, as his cutting books demonstrate,
his interests were wide ranging and should not be overlooked by
researchers.
This paper has demonstrated that the personal records of enthusiastic
amateur scientists such as Eglinton, Winterbotham and Duncan-Kemp
can contribute to the overall body of scientific knowledge. In
most instances they did not work in isolation but were members
of amateur societies and regularly corresponded with each other.
It is vital that archivists seek out the records of these societies
and to try to recover the personal papers of prominent individual
members. We believe that much of Australia's scientific history
and knowledge remains hidden in these types of collections. Our
own experience at John Oxley Library has revealed a number of
individuals worthy of a place in the next edition of the Guide
to the Archives of Science In Australia: Records of Individuals.
|