[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
liner voltige
-
To: handmrich@aol.com
-
Subject: liner voltige
-
From: "david john" <liness5@hotmail.com>
-
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 04:14:57 PDT
-
Cc: pjrichmond@pacunion.com, brosener@pacunion.com, ssmathers@pacunion.com, jsterley@pacunion.com, nsumner@pacunion.com, warnersu@aol.com, lweldon@pacunion.com, sodafran@well.com, stama@asap.unimelb.edu.au, Tim.Sherratt@asap.unimelb.edu.au, johnson@library.ucla.edu, rjohnson@library.ucla.edu, annette@asap.unimelb.edu.au, becker@mail.sub.uni-goettingen.de, Tim.Sherratt@discontents.com.au, hwsamuel@MIT.EDU, t69ub@eden.rutgers.edu, userid@nlm.nih.gov, gavan@asap.unimelb.edu.au, DDEVRIESE@admin.ulb.ac.be, shykes@bewellnet.com, BruceS@bf.rmit.edu.au, kellyk@ior.com, Barbara.Cytowicz@asap.unimelb.edu.au, helen@asap.unimelb.edu.au
-
Sender: owner-stama
GOD IS WITH US FARTHER SON SPEEKING IS TIME MANY SIGNS BUSEE PLANES BAD
MOUTH WORDS SPOKE EVERY DAY GOV MEDIA POLICE HAVE CAUTH OUT SELLING OF
FROM 1996 AND STILL ANY WAY AUSTARALI FLOADS DESE FIRES BUS DEATHS
EXPLOSION WATER SYDNEY COMP LABS FAIL BANK SFAILE SERVOES FSAILED ALSO
EXCHANGES ALL SYDNEY ANMD MANY FACTOREYSA WEST PCK JUST CRAHESD AGAIN
ARSK REM AND SUPERMARKETS CRASHED AND TILLS CARDS AGAIN AND SECRITY ALL
THROUGH EXCJHAGES AND GAS FROZE UP COMP SAME AND ELEC BLACK OUTS ALL
THIS HAS BEEN COVERD UP FOR MEID AGOV SELLING ASSETS AND STOCKS BONDS
AND BIULDING RERESTATE LIFTS AND SWICTHBOARDS WANT WORK MAIN FRAM POWER
SUPLLYS TWO AREAS ALSO PHONE COMPUOTR SENCORES ALARMS SAFTY SWICTHES OF
AND CANT PUT BACK ON REM MELT DOWN STOPS AND END OKAY ALL NEW TECH NEW
WAYS OUT THERE ALSO SIGNALS ALL STOP MNAY WAYS REM
AND WRITE DOWN WERE DESE ARE AND WHAT FOR CANT HERE LATER AND FOO TIN
TWO MAKE CAN FOOD STOPS ALSO SUPERMARKETS SAID JUST STATRTED WELL ASLO
PACKETS WRAPINGS AND LABES AND PRESS AND LINE VOLTIGE DIAL TONE
STOPS REM AND SWCTIBOARDS AND TRANSFORMERS 12 24 VOLTS FOR LABS AND
BIULDINGS STOP SO END OF TRANSFERS ALOS FROM LABS AND COMP DATA BANKS
ANY WAY TIME CURRANCY CODES STIOP ANY WAY AND ALL EQUIPMANT MADE WHANT
WORK ALSO CNAHGE ALL THING NEW ANY WAY YOUR REFINERS CLOSE NO AND WIRES
ALOS FROM TRANSFOREMES FUEL AND THE SEVRVOES CRASHED AND INSURANCE
COMPANY SNO POLICE HAVE ON TAPE AT 11,30 AM TODAY SEE END OF ALL POLIOCY
AND CLAIMES CANT BOOT AND POST SO ON AND ALSO ORDER FUEL AND SO ON ALL
DETAIL HERE BELOW CUT PAST FROM NET WAY BACK THERE ALOT MORE ANY WAY
AS YOU NO MILK AND BREAD AND MEDICANES AND BASIC HOW
GREED SECRETS BAD HAY AND DEC 99 DEFAULT AS THEY ARE CRASHING NOW
DEC WHANT WORK OKAY AND COME BACK ON
SIMPLE AND STORM ALSO METEROES SIGNALS CHAMING AND SPIKE AND SEP AM
RADIO THEN NOV 17 TV SUN PAPERS ONCE OKAY SO YOUI NO HAY ANY WAY ALL
SHOULD NO YES AND AIR LAND SEA STOPS HAY AND REM HOME WHEN TIME OKAY
HOME THINK WHAT YOU ALL DOWN AND WHRITE DOWN
F M S HG = GOD
AND THINK GOOD AWAKE TWO GOD
HIGH STREET STORES SELLING COMPUTERSTHAT FAIL MILLENNIUM BUG TEST ::
This press release is transmitted on behalf of Prove It 2000. Britain's
leading High Street retailers are selling millions of personal computers
to unsuspecting consumers that contain significant defects in relation
to the year 2000 computer Millennium-bug problem.
A joint investigation between Prove It 2000, an independent
computerauditing company based in Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, and the
Sunday Times has revealed that 80% of PCs tested in major outlets failed
at least one Millennium compliancy test. In all cases, in-store staff
assured investigators, which included a US computer expert, that ALL PCs
on sale were Millennium -compliant.Subsequent tests conducted in some
cases with the aid of shop-floor staff -revealed this assurance to be
unfounded.
Richard Coppel, joint chief executive of Prove It 2000, said:
''Ourresearch has revealed that personal computers are currently being
manufacturedand sold with non-compliant Real Time Clocks. This means
that there is asignificant likelihood that computer programmes run on
these machines could crash or malfunction in the Year 2000.'' In all,
26 PCs were tested in London stores on Wednesday 12 November.Further
tests were
conducted on stores in Watford on Friday 14 November. Thisfollowed tests
on 21 different PCs in Peterborough in July - in which all failed
Millennium compliancy tests. Retailers included Dixons, PC World, John
Lewis, Tempo, Tiny andHarrods. The machines, chosen at random,
included those manufactured by the someof the largest PC manufacturers
in the world.
Machines tested and failed included models produced by Compaq, Hewlett
Packard, Viglen, Apricot and Olivetti. Significantly, all tested models
produced by IBM, Tulip Computers and Fujitsu passed all eight
separatetests. Richard Coppel added: ''The run up to Christmas is the
busiest time ofyear for personal computer sales and it is surprising
that these products arebeing offered for sale. And it is not just home
users who may suffer - manysmall businesses rely on the High Street for
their computer requirements. ''Both the computer and retail industries
are
well aware of the problemsof the Year 2000 when it comes to software
(the programmes that drive computers) but they are ignoring very real
problems regarding computer hardware. All PCs have an internal clock.
This must be able to cope with the change to anew century. This is not
the ease and nobody is listening.'' ''We believe that manufacturers
and retailers of personal computers are exposing themselves to
significant danger in the courts if a customerwas to take legal
action.'' Prove It 2000 is the country's leading Year 2000 computer
consultancy, specialising in audit and fixing programmes for the
corporate sector. Founded by some of the UK's most experienced computer
professionals, the company counts large multi-national corporations
among its clients.
Notes to editors: There are around 4 million personal computers sold
every year in the UK.The fourth quarter is traditionally the busiest
period of the year. The Millennium bug is a consequence of technology
developed in the 1970sand 1980s when expensive computer memory was saved
by recording years as two digits instead of four. When I January 2000
arrives many systems willnot recognise the year and revert to 1900 or
1980s causing systems to crash. To date concern has focused on
software issues relating to the Year 2000bug, but the spotlight is
beginning to be turned on hardware - the millionsof PCs that sit on
desks or work stations across the world. Nearly every PC inthe world
is affected. All PCs have an internal ''clock'' - known as the Real
Time Clock -which allows the PC to keep track of date and time. Many
software programmesrely on this clock system to function. The Real Time
Clock- found on the PC's motherboard - is the source of all
time-related functions on the PC. In September 1997, the US Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) discovered that an order of 600 PCs failed
to pass its Millennium test and required significant upgrades. The NRC
test
found that the system's Real TimeClock was not Year 2000 compliant.
---------------BACK TO THE FUTURE: DE-BUGGING THE "MILLENNIUM BUG"
by Richard Raysman and Peter Brown As the
clock
strikes midnight on January 1, 2000, experts predictthat many of the
world'
scomputers will grind to a halt, disabled by what has been referred to
as"the Year 2000 Problem,""Y2K" or "the Millennium Bug." Computer
systems,
most of which containtwo-digit date fields, willinterpret the "00" in
the
date to refer to 1900. As a result, suchsystems will
miscalculatedate-sensitive computations or, more simply, just crash.
In other words,while the rest of the worldmoves forward at the turn of
the
century, computers will move backwardin time. Time is of theessence in
correcting this problem. The Millennium Bug is a major concern
for
most businesses andorganizations that rely ondate-dependent computer
systems. Experts have expressed concern thatdate-sensitive
calculationsbased
on erroneous data will cause widespread system failure -
affectingfinancial
transactions,investments, legal commitments and record-keeping.Problems
have already been
reported. For example, restaurantcomputers have rejected creditcards
which
expire after the turn of the century. A computer mistakeresulted in
early
parole forsome inmates in a state prison. The computer misread their
release
datesearly next century asrelease dates early this century. The problem
may
also affect expirationdates on food andpharmaceutical items, reservation
systems, transportation systems,accounting systems, insurancepremium
calculations and almost any other date-related functionsperformed by
computers. The Millennium Bug has created large scale potential
forliability. Year 2000 system failuresmay lead to contractual and
products
liability claims against softwarevendors, and may exposecorporate
officers
and directors who fail to address the problem toshareholder derivative
suits. It isconceivable that plaintiffs may bring personal injury suits
ifcomputerized products, such as hospitalequipment or elevators, fail as
a
result of date-sensitive calculations. The attention devoted to
the
Millennium Bug reflects both theextent to which we have come torely on
computers, and the potential magnitude of the problem. Althoughcoverage
of
the MillenniumBug has generated great concern in both the public and
private
sector,technical solutions areavailable. These solutions, however,
raise
certain legal issues, whichmust be addressed by attorneysinvolved in
computer-related transactions. Coordinated effort,assessment of legal
and
technicalcosts and risks, and timely attention to the problem may be the
key toprotecting against Year 2000related liability.
THE PROBLEM The Millennium Bug stems from early computer
programmingpractices. Until recently, the datefields of most computers
and
software were programmed to operate using asix-digit date field
(such as, YY/MM/DD), using only two digits to represent a year.
Unlessthe problem is corrected,these computers will recognize 00/01/01
as
January 1, 1900, rather thanJanuary 1, 2000. As aresult, any
date-sensitive
calculations may cause such systems to crash. Those programming
mainframes
twenty to thirty years ago probablygave little thought to theproblems
that
would arise at the end of the century. Two-digit datefields occupied
less
storagespace, and were faster to program and process. As a result,
thesetwo-digit date codes exist inmost programming languages. Moreover,
programming practices are notstandardized, so there isno single method
to
locate and correct date fields in different programsand systems.
Suchinconsistencies may require line-by-line data correction, to address
theYear 2000
Problem. THE SOLUTION Several
technical solutions have been proposed to correct theproblem. Some
haverecommended expanding two-digit codes to four digits. Others
haveproposed implementingsoftware which can logically determine whether
a
two-digit daterepresents a late twentieth centuryor early twenty-first
century date. Software applications to correct theproblem are already on
themarket and more are being developed. The appropriate technical
solutionmust be tailored to anorganization's particular systems and
software. Eliminating the Millennium Bug will be time-consuming
andexpensive. According to the GartnerGroup, a research firm, it will
cost
between $300 billion to $600billion worldwide to correct theproblem. The
cost in the United States alone is estimated to be $50billion to
$75 billion. Under theGartner Group's projections, it will cost
approximately one dollar perline of code to fix theproblem. A
medium-sized
company running 8000 programs with 1500 lines ofcode per programwould
need
to spend approximately $4 million to upgrade their systems.Large
corporations mayneed to expend $50-100 million and thousands of working
days percorporation to make their systems millennium compliant.
The problem has been addressed by the federal government, as wellas
numerous consultantsand organizations, including the Information
Technology
Association of America and the Federal Financial Institutions
Examination
Council. Senator Daniel PatrickMoynihan (D-N.Y.) introducedthe
"Commission
on the Year 2000 Computer Problem Act" (S. 2131) lastSeptember.
The billwould have established a fifteen-member bipartisan commission to
studyand analyze the scope ofthe Year 2000 problem and to assess the
resources and actions necessaryto address the problem.Senator Moynihan's
bill was not passed by the 104th Congress, but islikely to be taken up
againthis year. ------------One look at the Toshiba Satellite Pro 460
CDT
and it was easy for CRW Labs to understand why Toshiba
is
the runaway leader in worldwide notebook sales. Though
not
the lightest, smallest or even fastest notebook
lockable PC card slots and a cellular phone port for connecting the
modem
to acellular network, though
-------------------
If you think that just because your programs were not written in Cobol,
you
are safe from the effects of the "Millennium Bug" - think again. Many C
and
C++ programs are vulnerable also.
---------
Check your business insurance for Y2K exclusions!!
Many - if not most - business insurers are adding some fine print
amendments to their policies. What does the "fine print" exclude? Damage
done or caused by computers unable to handle the new millennium. Don't
say
you weren't warned!
--------------
Network Systems Also in Danger!
--------
Headlines Costs associated with the
failure of any single clearinghouse thatprocesses stock market trades
could amount to as much as $5.2 billion a week, whilethe inability of
any
large bank to settle trades could cost $3.3 billion, and the
failureof
any five small banks could cost $2.2 billion. If traders lose faith
in
theintegrity of the system, the resulting lost profits could
come
to as much as $1.2 billiona week.One estimate of the cost of fixing the
Year 2000 bug is $100 billion forU.S. companies alone,according to Bill
Dudley, managing director at Goldman, Sachs and Co.
Devices built before 1996 pose the greatest threat. Networks installed
before 1996 have a 90 percent chance of experiencing a Year 2000 related
problem
world insurance how pay all blank gets biger as we go yes
-------------
'2000 Bug' keeps lawyersbusy: Up to $2 trillion in lawsuits expected
over
computer glitch By Joel J. Smith / The Detroit News DETROIT -- When the
dreaded Millennium Bug strikes, thousands of businesses around the
nation
are expected to adopt a standard problem-solving tactic: sue somebody.
Legal wrangling over the pervasive Year 2000 computer glitch
couldproduce up to $2 trillion in lawsuits, experts say -- far more than
the costs of altering computer programs to fix the problem.
Recognizing the potential, many of Metro Detroit's large law firms
already have designated "Year 2000" teams that will handle expected
litigation and advise clients on ways to avoid liability. "When a glitch
is
identified as a
Year 2000 problem, people are going to sue," said Claudia
Rast, an attorney and Year 2000 expert with the Detroit law
firm of Dickinson, Wright, Moon, Van Dusen & Freeman.
"There will be all kinds of targets out there for
potential lawsuits. "It's a huge, huge domino."
On Thursday, the U.S. House Banking Committee approved
a bill that will help vulnerable credit unions and savings and loan
associations cope with the problem. It's the first
action by Congress on the Millennium Bug.
The Year 2000 problem is a result of the standard use of two
digits instead of four in computer programs to identify the year.
For instance, 1998 is just "98." But that won't work when the year
2000 arrives -- computers will think it's 1900. The innocent-sounding
problem can causeserious consequences for tens of thousands of computer
functions: Calculating interest payments, operating a nuclear power
plant,
keeping track of airplanes in the sky, opening bank vaults and
operating
computerized
signal lights and
gates.All will be subject to errors and confusion.
In some cases, computers simply will stop
working. Fixing the problem isn't easy. Large
corporations with main frame computers often have
millions of linesof computer code that must be
examined for the two-digit date problem.
Standish Group International, a high-tech research group
based in Dennis, Mass., estimates that U.S. businesses alone
spend $440 billion to correct the problem.
And in many cases, the job won't be completed in time.
Most Fortune 500 companies including
the Big Three auto
companies are well on their way to fixing the problem. But it's
the smaller companies that are dragging theirfeet.
Sheldon Klein, an attorney and Year 2000expert with ButzeL
Long of Detroit, said his firm is doing preventative counseling to
protect clients from potential Year 2000 risks.
That includes doing legal audits for clients
that will identify possible Year 2000 liability.
Klein said he offers Year 2000 legal advice on
contracts, buying and selling of companies and dealing with services
hired
to fix the problem. "Litigation will take place starting now but
more so down the road," Klein said. "When things don't
work, contracts don't get performed. When businesses
are severely harmed, there are going to be court cases."
Potential targets for lawsuits surrounding the Year 2000
problem include: * Companies hired to correct the problem may miss
aline of programming with the Bug, disrupting
computers and possibly causing a financial loss. * Shareholder lawsuits
against companydirectors and officers for failing to correct the
problem.
* Warranty disputes with software companies for failing to provide
Year 2000-compatible programs. * Disagreements over employment contracts
and trade secrets as computer
programers, in short supplyand highly valued, move
between companies. "Lawyers are going to make
a
lot of money off this," said Steve Bruss, a Year
2000
expert with Syntel Inc.in Troy, a worldwide
computer
service firm that handles the millennium problem.
"When the problems start surfacing,you're going to
start pulling out your contracts and looking for someone to
blame." Rast and other
attorneys expect to be increasingly busy as the clock ticks toward
New Year's Eve, 1999. "I just hope the power
works on Saturday, Jan. 1, 2000," she said. "I
think
I'm staying home that NewYear's Eve." The game plan Ameritech, the
state's
largest local telephone carrier, has been working on the Year 2000
problem
for nearly two years. The company hopes to have the problem resolved
within
12 months. This involves the following: * Examine 25 million lines of
computer code for two-digit references to the year.
* Convert 1,400 switches for handling phone calls to recognize the year
2000 and beyond. * Analyze and make ready thousands of desktop
components
such as computers, telephones and faxes to operate properly using
dates
after the turn of the century.
* Go through 6,000 buildings, access systems,
heating and cooling plants, alarms and elevators and
updating them where necessary.
"The bottom line is you need to do everything
you
can to get ready for the year 2000 -- the due date for the work is not
negotiable," said Fred Kowitz, the corporate director for the
Year 2000 initiative at Ameritech.
------------
The New York Law JournalJune 3, 1997 There are more serious
possibilities regarding liability. One such example is the possibility
of awrongful death claim that might arise out of an airplane crash that
canbe related to inaccurate airplane maintenance, which resulted from
inaccurate dates on theairline's computer system. Other claims could
stem from liability for situations in volvingtime-locked vaults,
automated manufacturing equipment, elevators and any other injury
resulting
from computer controlled systems.While these possibilities seem remote,
they
present new areas ofcoverage worthy of consideration. If millennium
bug
probabilities and potential size of claims arehigh, insurance carriers
mightlook to exclude millennium bug related claims from
policies.Resolution
While it may appear that companies have until Dec. 31, 1999
toaddress
this problem, this isnot the case. Most computer programmers utilize
the
number ''9'' as adefault to denote anythingother than a specific piece
of
information. For
example, if a date ismissing, certain applications
mayinput ''99'' as a default for the year. It is therefore likely that
certain computer systems will not beable to properly process any date
with
the year 1999, or ''99'' as itwould appear to the computersystem. It is
in
every organizations best interest to target a deadlineof Dec. 31, 1998
to
resolve thisissue.
------
Frequency through the Energy Interface Delivery System (EIDS).
ON TOXIC WAIST PLANTS ALSO
also gov new and secret bad mistake hay didnt think of food medicans
safty toxic hay any way all plains was on net also cant fly radar and
wage sytemm and fuel and booking sytem and ppower suplys any way dont
yell pass on elderly rehabs will come home want they
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com